Gijs wrote in Wed Nov 13, 2019 1:55 pm:Also note that there are often many (subtle) differences between specific aircraft (even though they may have the same type number)
. NORM and START there is no "CON."
CaptB wrote in Wed Nov 13, 2019 1:40 pm:It would be a better idea to refer to the FCOM not to PMDG.
Isaak wrote in Wed Nov 13, 2019 7:03 pm:@V12: I don't see the added value of your comment. As Gijs pointed out: there are different versions in real life and one has to make choices when simulating.
Isaak wrote in Wed Nov 13, 2019 7:03 pm:@CaptB: I'll see if I can do something about the overhead.ac, but it will take time as I don't have much of that atm due to RL obligations at work.
V12 wrote in Wed Nov 13, 2019 7:09 pm:Isaak wrote in Wed Nov 13, 2019 7:03 pm:@V12: I don't see the added value of your comment. As Gijs pointed out: there are different versions in real life and one has to make choices when simulating.
It is visual confirmation of Gijs's post. Where is problem ?
CaptainCrazyAviation wrote in Thu Nov 14, 2019 1:47 am:How about the utility thingy and pass signs on the left of the battery switch.
CaptB wrote in Wed Nov 13, 2019 7:39 pm:
It's a rather simple operation, should not take you long once you have some time (a weekend evening over tea), but here's something else that I noticed and actually once pointed out on the IRC channel which can be remedied quickly: The 300 mesh(not ER) has everything doubled(all objects are x2 all at the exact same positions)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest