icare38 wrote in Fri May 17, 2019 5:50 pm:PS
To FGFS developers:
Ill' be very happy when ai(?)/mp related big memory leak will be fixed.
what memory leak?
what version of FG?
icare38 wrote in Fri May 17, 2019 5:50 pm:PS
To FGFS developers:
Ill' be very happy when ai(?)/mp related big memory leak will be fixed.
The last time you said I should prove my point I did, and you ignored a lot of it and then the moderators removed all of those posts. This is great for you because now you get to tell me to prove my point again while you know very well that the moderators will remove those posts if I prove it for like a third time.
So stop talking about or to me then.
Octal450 wrote in Fri May 17, 2019 9:43 pm:So stop talking about or to me then.
Hard to do when you keep attacking me. I don't sit and take shit from people, sorry.
Kind Regards,
Josh
Octal450 wrote in Thu May 16, 2019 9:32 pm:Lydiot just likes to whine about how bad jomo is constantly. I just ignore him now as arguing with him is mostly pointless.
As an alternative to your approach variant you can also ask the pilot to use a transition as they do in real life at EDDF.
At EDDF we use SID/STARS as seen on the Radar/Screen-films - and it did cost me a lot of time to put them onto the screen - in order to be able to supervise traffic! And even for these (more easy) procedures there are only very few (1% ?) pilots using them. To add other procedures to it (which most pilots will not even know what that is) would be a lot of more burden for the single ATC. But I would appreciate if more pilots would use the STAR/SIDs.
as far as i know the procedures in EDDF in real life are a bit different, for ex they use 25c/07c also for approaches and the usage of taxiways is different.
That is correct. I changed that to help beginners: i.e. nobody gets delayed if a beginner needs 10 sec or 10 min to get ready to start. And it is easy to remember "use tw L for incoming - N for outgoing". To force every plane to a unique parking-position requires a lot more ATC work - i.e. would need a GND-ATC for a 4h job for each session if he may sit there for many hours without work! I tried that several times - but none ever tried it a second time! So again: That is done to ease this so (even new-bee) pilots can do that themselves! It really always became very confusing if a GND-ctrl is assigned but not available when needed! That happened every time I tried - so I do not accept GND or other support-ATCs any more!
switch virtually between positions(delivery,ground,approach/depart, center)
I am not sure how that should work: Using 5 different FGFS-IDs (as well on typing as on mumble!) instead of the one we use today? No - I would not like that additional burden for a single ATC! That may be ok if only 1 plane arrives - but sometimes there are 5 same time - I am afraid that would lead to a lot confusion (and my brain may explode!). e.g. how would you know/remember with what ID you were just talking to what pilot - and reverse.
why not also assigning an approaching plane a gate or stand after vacating the runway and give taxi instructions?
We tried that - but most pilots do not know were that stand is or do not like it! And ATC must know all Airplane sizes and company area etc. (Gate, Lot, e.t.c) or pilots would just like to discuss why this and not that. Again: I am afraid that would be nice if you have may ATCs that have learned to work in a team. And be aware: How to remember which Pilot has a unique parkinglot (like e.g.LH-1701).
FED-EX wrote in Thu May 23, 2019 12:29 pm:@Jomo: How do I get the scenery visible at your movie 20190522wed1756-105 at 25:30 - 26:45? .
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests