Board index FlightGear Development Aircraft

777 ALS compared to IDG-A32X lightning

Questions and discussion about creating aircraft. Flight dynamics, 3d models, cockpits, systems, animation, textures.

Re: 777 ALS compared to IDG-A32X lightning

Postby pavlin » Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:50 pm

Wow, that's looks different. Well, I don't know, just was thinking that if the plane is more visible, will be better experience for viewer. Octal, what did you meant by bloom settings?
O, Lego, I think that your's cockpit looks better in night because it is modeled really realistically. With every new fork that your 3D modeler pushes into the plane it gets more and more realistic. Are not that a reason to think it is better?
The light is different. If I land on EDDF with the 777 at the same time it will look more darker on ground, I am sure.
This is only suggestions, I am not trying to pick a fight again.
During severe issues with navigation on FlightGear I will not create any type of content until I buy myself new pc. That might be in years from now.
User avatar
pavlin
Retired
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 3:34 pm
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria [LBSF]
Callsign: PavlinS
Version: 2018 3.1
OS: Windows 10 Pro

Re: 777 ALS compared to IDG-A32X lightning

Postby Lydiot » Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:34 am

it0uchpods wrote in Sun Sep 30, 2018 9:39 pm:@Lydiot.

FGFS 2018.2.1, and IDG-A32X (find in my github in my signature)
Med-High settings and ALS with landmass shaders all the way on.

Josh


thx :)
Lydiot
 
Posts: 985
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 10:50 pm

Re: 777 ALS compared to IDG-A32X lightning

Postby Octal450 » Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:55 am

No problem
I am a person.
User avatar
Octal450
 
Posts: 4387
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 12:51 pm

Previous

Return to Aircraft

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests