Interesting.
Just found your data on Viggen and at Mach 0.6 Aeromatic seems to agree very well from 0- 40 000 ft. So it does not seem to be the case that they are underpowered.
Necolatis wrote in Fri Mar 31, 2017 6:35 pm:but I switched to AeromatiC++.
erik wrote in Fri Apr 14, 2017 11:55 am:The AeromatiC++ table takes into account that an idling engine at high speed actually generates drag instead of thrust. That's probably the difference.
Erik
erik wrote in Fri Apr 14, 2017 12:01 pm:Update: but keep in mind it has to match for the low bypass ratio jets all the way up to the high bypass ratio geared turbofans.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests