"De gustibus non est disputandum" (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_gustibus_non_est_disputandum )
Unfortunately here we're talking about a topic that is often linked to personal tastes and therefore difficult to argue.
Objectively it is not a color temperature problem, as I have already pointed out!
A suitable monitor configuration, which I find truly complicated as the computer is also used for other things that it is not only to fly a plane into FGFs, could solve part of the problem, but not the fact that the amount of color information of FGFs is at least 4 times higher (64 vs 256) to the eye's ability to discern colors. You need to compress too many levels of color in less levels, this is what makes the HDR.
This is an example which shows that changing the display settings may serve some purpose, but it is not the same thing! As you see, the problem is that the original image has a lot more blue than green and even less to red, are not balanced! This is the reason that the image looks cool, I'm sorry, but this is a defect not a quality! If I go to see well-balanced photographic images I will see that the three curves to the right end (high-lights) finish together. In this case you see a picture with an obvious unbalance (Blue finished much more to the right of the green and the green to the right of the red) that is NOT due to the monitor, but only from an incorrect color balance that generated the engine rendering! Of course if an image is all blue, we will have the dominant blue curve, but if it is well balanced, it will be seen, although smaller, the curves of green and red that always end with the blue.
Of course you can correct with the monitor, but the fix is only fictitious and leads to unbalance the colors of all the applications in the system, including the menu;) the canvas etc ... sucks!
The easiest thing is to correct the defect, because that is the right name!
In the picture "B" you see the HDR image obtained from the first, not only is more balanced because I changed the color temperature, but now the curves are missing peaks in order to reduce the spatial frequency and thus improve the visual perception. The HDR is not a whim, but a powerful tool for generating an interface between the application and the eye of the observer.
I wish you would avoid saying things without checking carefully, in this case it seems clear that there is a problem and its solution could be simple and handy.
This is another example ...
Original image with blue high light dominant
Correct image:
Obviously if you increase the flight altitude increases the more dominant blue and in this case has a sense to move the blue curve further to the right, ie to increase the color temperature, but always with great care since the eye is not a camera