Bomber wrote in Mon Dec 14, 2015 3:54 pm:Oh I didn't smear em.... that was something I read here written by someone else....
Ok so that was a false statement by the third party.
Oh and in your opinion I'm whining, by asking a question you didn't answer.
It's whining when you demand clarification for something that didn't happen.
So WHO are these core developers, that object to military development. Development that when brought up gets bombed on these forums time and time again by two people and two people only..
I'm not going to provide any names. It was a statement about that happened back then, just for clarification. If you see more to the post you're wrong.
One doesn't get to be a core developer unless one proves themselves, yet you can't do that without core developers being involved.. so you have to play nicely in the sand pit, not rock the boat and part of that is agree with them..
Which is life. I come up to you, smack you in the head and then ask for your help to fix my car. Would you do that?
You talk about not smearing core developers ? How about the bombing of content development threads and stuff of vitos... where we're you then ?
That was way to much fro me to follow. I concentrate on threads that i find interesting, not the ones that suck the life out of me.
How come you allow an individual to be smeared but for me to question just who these core developers are and their involvement and you're straight in.
Simple, I did not get involved in those discussion, and Vitos was there to defend himself. I was however involved in discussion withe the core developers who I was talking about. And in contrast to Vitos, there are not around to defend themselves.
Grow a pair.
Maybe you should back off a bit. You're the one seeing ghosts.
Erik