Expectation to be treated justly hardly qualifies as "attitude".
Not as such. It becomes 'attitude' when it has to be your justice or bust. You've seen justice - it's been Rob's version of it, and you've not been happy with it.
See, the fact of the matter is that the situation isn't objectively clear or simple. Curt tells you that part of him has trouble finding too much fault. I have said a few times that I feel I can't really judge this. We have seen a few people leaning clearly towards Rob. We've seen a few others leaning clearly towards you. If we'd take this thread as a poll, the numbers would go close to fifty-fifty.
This should perhaps make you pause and wonder whether it's really the clear cut case you're seeing - many others at least don't see it that way. The notion of what 'just treatment' is varies a bit.
It becomes again attitude when the simple fact that I refuse to side with you immediately and condemn Rob is enough in your eyes to make me guilty by association.
See, I honestly think a lot of the situation could have been salvaged by quietly inquiring for the reasons of what happened, and then see whether Rob can't be persuaded nicely to reconsider his decision (probably not with Israel...). After accusations of censorship, threats and attempts to take the moral high ground and cast him as the villain - well, you practically left him no choice - in fact you confirmed his whole reasoning. And that's where attitude gets into the way, because it's an all volunteer project. My way or bust doesn't work.