Board index FlightGear Development Aircraft

Bombardier CRJ700 series/CRJ900 replacement

Questions and discussion about creating aircraft. Flight dynamics, 3d models, cockpits, systems, animation, textures.

Re: Bombardier CRJ700 series/CRJ900 replacement

Postby IAHM-COL » Mon Jul 06, 2015 3:00 am

Thanks Hamza

Also you can clone the whole thing and checkout the branch

Code: Select all
git clone https://github.com/FGMEMBERS/CRJ700-family.git
git checkout canvas


And then start adding the code/instrumentation
If we gave everybody in the World free software today, but we failed to teach them about the four freedoms, five years from now, would they still have it? Probably not, because if they don’t recognise their freedoms, they’ll let their freedoms fall
User avatar
IAHM-COL
Retired
 
Posts: 4064
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 5:40 pm
Location: Homey, NV (KXTA) - U.S.A
Callsign: HK-424D or ICAO4243
Version: 3.7-git
OS: Linux

Re: Bombardier CRJ700 series/CRJ900 replacement

Postby wkitty42 » Mon Jul 06, 2015 1:06 pm

hamzaalloush wrote in Sun Jul 05, 2015 10:56 pm:
wkitty42 wrote in Sun Jul 05, 2015 10:52 pm:that's easy... the request was made in the dev list and those who deigned to respond as requested did so... those who didn't have not been given permissions (yet)... makes sense, yes? ;)


yes, it does.. i wasn't clear on the exact procedure for migrating :) it was more of a curiosity on my part. anyone able to re-instate his rights, providing i get his account and permission? also, we might want to look for introducing D-JSB into the group, what do you suggest the best course of action?

Thanks

you are welcome... as i understand it, one has to upload their SSH key to SF on their SF account... i don't think you can do this for Skyop... Skyop needs to do it if they want access again...
"You get more air close to the ground," said Angalo. "I read that in a book. You get lots of air low down, and not much when you go up."
"Why not?" said Gurder.
"Dunno. It's frightened of heights, I guess."
User avatar
wkitty42
 
Posts: 6147
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2015 3:46 pm
Location: central NC, USA
Callsign: wk42
Version: git next
OS: Kubuntu 14.04.5

Re: Bombardier CRJ700 series/CRJ900 replacement

Postby jsb » Thu Jul 23, 2015 8:28 pm

Ladies and Gentlemen, finally I feel there is some version 1.5 beta to be tested by the interested airmen :)
You may find it here: https://github.com/d-jsb/CRJ700-family/tree/next



Plese see the README for a quick overview of changes and try the new checklists.
Documentation is not yet done so Docs/* is probably outdated.
Have fun and if you like it tell it to others, if you do not like it tell me ;)
Last edited by jsb on Sun Dec 04, 2016 9:49 pm, edited 2 times in total.
jsb
 
Posts: 242
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 8:17 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Callsign: D-JSB
Version: next
OS: Win7/Linux

Re: Bombardier CRJ700 series/CRJ900 replacement

Postby legoboyvdlp » Thu Jul 23, 2015 8:39 pm

Great, IAHM-COL?
User avatar
legoboyvdlp
 
Posts: 7403
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 1:28 am
Callsign: YV-LEGO
Version: next
OS: Windows 10 HP

Re: Bombardier CRJ700 series/CRJ900 replacement

Postby jsb » Thu Jul 23, 2015 8:41 pm

I would like to wait for some feedback and bug reports before we merge it into the "offical" FGMEMBERS / master
What do you think?
jsb
 
Posts: 242
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 8:17 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Callsign: D-JSB
Version: next
OS: Win7/Linux

Re: Bombardier CRJ700 series/CRJ900 replacement

Postby jsb » Thu Jul 23, 2015 8:48 pm

From the development hangar ;)
http://imgur.com/a/jF6vw#0
jsb
 
Posts: 242
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 8:17 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Callsign: D-JSB
Version: next
OS: Win7/Linux

Re: Bombardier CRJ700 series/CRJ900 replacement

Postby IAHM-COL » Thu Jul 23, 2015 9:46 pm

@lego @d-jsb

I think is all a matter of method --and interpretation.

This is my opinion.

The earlier you merge into FGMEMBERs the better.
Don't worry about "status" as in finished job.


Why? because that way you can gain tester/debuggers on an identical code. Example:: someone debugging the FGMEMBERS -if this is behind, may produce debug reports outdated, and maybe no-longer valid. Or if problems were introduced, people will not noticed them until you actually sync the repos.

The best way to go is sync frequently, and keep it as similar as able -- and thus you can take a debug from any of the forks as a valid, and updated.

You do not need to treat forks as "branches". There are still possibility to make branches to do the "branches" work. Experimental stuff, new code, etc.

what if the thing is broken?
Not a problem! :D

OpenSource philosophy. If you place enough eyes into the code, no bug is a major bug. The larger your userbase is on the bleeding edge (dev front) the fast the bugs can be detected, tracked, hunted. FGMEMBERs is not a shop for finished products. As a matter of fact is the perfect opposite. It is, totally, a mechanic's Hangar. Get your stuff in there early (release early release often), keep producing and listen to the wind (a.k.a what your testers have to say).

In other words, do not get testers to discern where to get the plane. Sync early, and make the where not a question (as in, it does not matter: it is all the same anyways). Change to a "what". What is great, what can be improved.

Once again, FGMEMBERs is not a shop of finished products. Notice we have most every aircraft I could get my hands on. Even aircraft that duly underperform. Sometimes just carcasses of planes. Get the people to engage in development. Testers: the most valuable resource.
If we gave everybody in the World free software today, but we failed to teach them about the four freedoms, five years from now, would they still have it? Probably not, because if they don’t recognise their freedoms, they’ll let their freedoms fall
User avatar
IAHM-COL
Retired
 
Posts: 4064
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 5:40 pm
Location: Homey, NV (KXTA) - U.S.A
Callsign: HK-424D or ICAO4243
Version: 3.7-git
OS: Linux

Re: Bombardier CRJ700 series/CRJ900 replacement

Postby jsb » Thu Jul 23, 2015 10:04 pm

Ok :) I just merged it into FGMEMBERS and updated the URL in my post. Lets see what happens :)
jsb
 
Posts: 242
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 8:17 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Callsign: D-JSB
Version: next
OS: Win7/Linux

Re: Bombardier CRJ700 series/CRJ900 replacement

Postby IAHM-COL » Thu Jul 23, 2015 10:07 pm

Well ... the first thing :D I've got the plane now: time for me to test. ... (and anyone on FGDATA with submodules for that matter)

I'll leave a note in the USA tour, because people flying it this saturday may want to get a hot start in testing

Thanks d-jsb
Last edited by IAHM-COL on Thu Jul 23, 2015 10:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If we gave everybody in the World free software today, but we failed to teach them about the four freedoms, five years from now, would they still have it? Probably not, because if they don’t recognise their freedoms, they’ll let their freedoms fall
User avatar
IAHM-COL
Retired
 
Posts: 4064
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 5:40 pm
Location: Homey, NV (KXTA) - U.S.A
Callsign: HK-424D or ICAO4243
Version: 3.7-git
OS: Linux

Re: Bombardier CRJ700 series/CRJ900 replacement

Postby danielHL » Thu Jul 23, 2015 10:08 pm

Congrats on the beta release, jsb. Very great work :) I had the opportunity to debug and beta test this for a few weeks now. It is really getting more and more realistic features. I promise I will work on the documentation and get something out before the final release...

CU
Daniel
danielHL / GVA0387 / D-FMPW / (UA83DAN)
danielHL
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Fri May 02, 2014 6:23 pm
Callsign: UA83DAN, GVA0387
Version: git
OS: Linux

Re: Bombardier CRJ700 series/CRJ900 replacement

Postby legoboyvdlp » Thu Jul 23, 2015 10:10 pm

Good job! Looks great. Might just get up to the level of the A320 and 777 soon!
User avatar
legoboyvdlp
 
Posts: 7403
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 1:28 am
Callsign: YV-LEGO
Version: next
OS: Windows 10 HP

Re: Bombardier CRJ700 series/CRJ900 replacement

Postby jsb » Thu Jul 23, 2015 10:14 pm

Thanks :D
again: see the new checklists, they are not "real live" but I created them as kind of in game help. markers were done in the CRJ900 and thus are missaligned for CRJ700/1000 anyhow...
have fun :)
jsb
 
Posts: 242
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 8:17 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Callsign: D-JSB
Version: next
OS: Win7/Linux

Re: Bombardier CRJ700 series/CRJ900 replacement

Postby jsb » Fri Jul 24, 2015 7:02 am

I guess I was to tired last night, I did the wrong pull request.
Just retried it, hopefully FGMEMBERS is now up to date with the latest changes.
My apologies if you already downloaded from FGMEMBERS in the last hours. Please refresh...
jsb
 
Posts: 242
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 8:17 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Callsign: D-JSB
Version: next
OS: Win7/Linux

Re: Bombardier CRJ700 series/CRJ900 replacement

Postby IAHM-COL » Fri Jul 24, 2015 7:25 pm

Not a prob. :D

I updated again, and I m on the fresher new status, again :D

Thanks for all this great work Henning :D

Israel
If we gave everybody in the World free software today, but we failed to teach them about the four freedoms, five years from now, would they still have it? Probably not, because if they don’t recognise their freedoms, they’ll let their freedoms fall
User avatar
IAHM-COL
Retired
 
Posts: 4064
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 5:40 pm
Location: Homey, NV (KXTA) - U.S.A
Callsign: HK-424D or ICAO4243
Version: 3.7-git
OS: Linux

Re: Bombardier CRJ700 series/CRJ900 replacement

Postby jsb » Fri Jul 24, 2015 9:55 pm

jsb
 
Posts: 242
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 8:17 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Callsign: D-JSB
Version: next
OS: Win7/Linux

PreviousNext

Return to Aircraft

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], MSN [Bot] and 3 guests