@Torsten, how I hate to quote you. I wonder how I take this risk..
Just for the sake of completeness and to avoid misunderstanding:
Torsten: There is a lot of coordination and communication going on between most "core developers".
Michat: I hope most means, all, or almost a representation when someone absence of the technical board, if exists.
Torsten: Just a little bit of this is visible as we sometimes meet face-to-face and much more often voice or video-chat.
Michat: A good reason to understand that lack of coordination regarding that situation around gui canvas.
Torsten: The parallel development of HTML and Qt based UI happens by intention and is not the result of missing coordination.
Parallel should means wingsider.. while I begin to understand that in freesotfware usually means Fork-Deviation-Duplicity, anyway researching for new functionalities advantages is a good intention.
Been my work a tiny contribution, I felt bad about you the programmers typing code for a dream over dream, over dream. You dream fast Torsten.
End of Torsten part.
Start loud thinking.
Why so smart people repeat same structure, why all freesoftware structures replicate the same fork-pararell pattern ? is a social pattern behavior? it is a free radical ramdomness? it is the time-line, or our communication system that can't guarantee nuclear success and best results/efforts?
Last week I did contact with some Extra-500 developers who didn't know about my svg work, and they liked. And I felt bad.
Then I found that there are several pararell starting projects for the MD. And I felt bad. So using the forum I was trying to make certain that people share information and knowledge both together on what's happens at same time-line on mD's. Something is wrong in the communication system.
We should be monoids our funcion is to share info and colaborate in a nuclear way to our monads, each monoid can do what is capable off around some possibilities skills offered.
Each monad are interconected, and their function is coordinate between others monads and to coordinate their monoids groups in order to reach common desired objetives.
If someone with hi skill wants to create his own monad, that monoid will be subject to the general monad function in order to find the common desired objetive.
There are a lot of possibilities in order to create a monad. You can create a R+D monad, but you can only be a monoid representative of that monad, the result will be total of the cooperations decisions to reach the common desired objetive (monad creation statement (member of the common desired objetives)). As a FG's monoid you can be member of the monads you are more interested based on your skill and some options offerted.
I don't find a better way to do it, growing organicaly from core, so when I see you in pararell wing by wing buzzing me at light speed I can be certain that at least a little of thrust are my two cents. You developers don't know the lot of WOW's we share watching your skill - developments - projects going on. But also you should know that sometimes we feel bad when those things happens, loosing valuable projects - people, same time we see the big efforts you are doing such in communications as well programming, writting, etc, etc.
Appart of gui topic I wonder/ thinking in methods on how the qt5/html5 css3 could be used to implement such a organic structure, in the way that monads could offers different lists (proposals) with assorted skill funtions activities to new monoids, improving coordination/communications/states of devs, flying center , fgvirtual airlines and more.
The world that in my oppinion should populated the web page (nice design effort now, thank you a lot). The world I tried to explain with these lines, because I'm reading a book entitled Pure Theory Of the Republic ( taking Republic like a public things, common objetives, agreements, solutions, but not in the usual gov political way ) been this book the most modern policy theory nowadays. It just the starting point to grow with the discover of the Political monads theory, very surprised to me that the most advance political researcher, still has not discovered the monoids, instead off he declares the monads like the minimun unit with significance discovered, beeing that and advance in politics.
While I saw that funcional programing really have monoids. I get socked. We can do it !, we are monoids !, lets offers functions to the people.
We cannot invert our positions in order to create an especular image of our monoidal world. Sometimes I hope you devs going to MP in order to see how much grattitude can people express about your work, more than feedback is kind of reverse experience, monoid says monoid do hehehee.
Can we do grow like a fractal ? do we have an snapshot of the body morphology or our code. Are we fatty amorphous?
For example in order to invert the funcion I could add some code to those aircraft that lack of <replay my control button> in case will be easy task for non programmer, same task could be offered to others that can match the objetive. A lot of silly thing can be offered by a funtional system. Where a little mind could grow in a non facebookish social cross-transversal fashion.
My country is lacking of researchers due to crisis and salary, I know one that is goig to move to swiss where he is going to work in his a laureatus investigation, animal facebookish inter social networks. As a good Darwinism member he is well payed to say that the man destination is extintion, because Man don't cooperate together.
I wish also to be well payed to say that the only way is contributing in the right way, even so if whe have nothing sure, is the coordinated work that can give us a change.
Thanks you guys to take time reading this combo.
What do you think guys?.