To me there seem to be 2 target audiences..
1) The user who wants to understand if the planes worth downloading.
2) The developer who wants to attract specialist developers to fill in the blanks.
Simon.
Jabberwocky wrote in Thu May 29, 2014 2:18 pm:@hvengel:
Personally, the P51D is a nice plane, I love it from an aesthetic point of view, but since I don't own a joystick, I can't fly it. Maybe I figure out how to do it with keyboard, maybe not. Actually, I would like to try, but I have currently a testflight over two days running, then some training rounds with the 747-8 freighter and thus ... it will take a little time. Which actually illuminates the real statistical problem: A small base set and users who hadn't even time to try a certain model, therefore not rating at all and therefore implicitly coming up as zero-ratings in the appearance of a fun-factor rating.
@HJ1AN:
How much throttle did you use at take-off? I think, I use too much and lose control on the runway because of the higher torque.
Jabberwocky wrote in Thu May 29, 2014 2:18 pm:@HJ1AN:
How much throttle did you use at take-off? I think, I use too much and lose control on the runway because of the
Bomber wrote in Thu May 29, 2014 3:41 pm:Arh yes and that reminds me.... 143 planes with no rating what-so-ever.
What's the process for getting these rated ?
Simon.
hvengel wrote in Thu May 29, 2014 4:39 pm:It is the responsibility of the aircraft maintainer/developer....
Bomber wrote in Thu May 29, 2014 1:48 pm:To me there seem to be 2 target audiences..
1) The user who wants to understand if the planes worth downloading.
2) The developer who wants to attract specialist developers to fill in the blanks.
This is basically what we do right now. Except that users can still opt to show all (including unrated) aircraft, by clicking one of the check boxes.hvengel wrote:: At some point we simply no longer display any info about unrated aircraft on the download page.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests