Mkayyyyy ...... pushed it!! (actually.... getting
the ./objects error, I'll have to see if I can get it to complete)
I don't know what's going to happen if this iteration doesn't work 100%... Oh well,
I tested it and
it works. (Or it
worked, I just made a small untested patch before I sent it off...)
Hooray, you and I had the same idea, for TUT, but I was going to leave the clone alone... we can just keep working on TUT there, if you want (revert one or two commits, maybe make a new branch). But I already did that in the master branch, and added 1-2 bugfixes to both.
I learned a few things about Git today, I'll say. I didn't have to copy any files this time to a temp folder - just manipulating branches was enough - and I managed to add one to the clone before finalizing the master one.
P.S. I don't know what language retreive is... there's no entry on wiktionary! But it's a lot more convenient to type than retrieve.
Looking at the etymology, it looks like I could just be starting the next spelling change for it:
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/retrieve#Etymology