I disagree Figaro.
Flightgear airport statistics will be different than real life flying statistics. For example, KSFO is clearly the most active location. Why? All the FG software versions start there, and there is almost always someone flying there.
The domestic UK is popular over the weekends. Why? FGUK has made it active.
Flightgear doesn't have to worry about population statistics, fuel costs, airport taxes, and other real life matters. As a result, you can never tell which new airport will become popular. I remember that Bishop, California got a boast when Calico started ATCing there.
I think UVA should stay dedicated to its current region, since that is what it's known for.