Board index FlightGear Development Spaceflight

Space Shuttle - Development

Discussion about development and usage of spacecraft

Re: Space Shuttle - Development

Postby Thorsten » Mon Dec 24, 2018 11:10 am

Merry Christmas from the far North!

Image
Thorsten
 
Posts: 12490
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 9:33 am

Re: Space Shuttle - Development

Postby GinGin » Mon Dec 24, 2018 12:14 pm

Thanks , Merry Christmas Guys :)

Looks like a screen from FG
GinGin
 
Posts: 1580
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 11:41 am
Location: Paris
Callsign: Gingin

Re: Space Shuttle - Development

Postby Catalanoic » Mon Dec 24, 2018 4:23 pm

Merry christmas from sunny Barcelona!!
User avatar
Catalanoic
 
Posts: 1099
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 1:33 am
Location: Barcelona (LEBL)
Callsign: Catalanoic
Version: 2017.3
OS: Lubuntu/Windows 7

Re: Space Shuttle - Development

Postby wlbragg » Mon Dec 24, 2018 8:46 pm

"Merry Christmas Houston. Oh, and did I mention we have a problem!"

Image
Kansas and Ohio/Midwest scenery development.
KEQA, 3AU, KRCP Airport Layout
Intel i7/GeForce RTX 2070/Max-Q
User avatar
wlbragg
 
Posts: 7609
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:31 am
Location: Kansas (Tornado Alley), USA
Callsign: WC2020
Version: next
OS: Win10/Linux/RTX 2070

Re: Space Shuttle - Development

Postby legoboyvdlp » Mon Dec 24, 2018 9:25 pm

Oh er. Quite a situation there.

I wonder could a human survive jumping out and floating down with an EVA suit?

I suppose they are doing mach 28, so... No :(
User avatar
legoboyvdlp
 
Posts: 7981
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 2:28 am
Location: Northern Ireland
Callsign: G-LEGO
Version: next
OS: Windows 10 HP

Re: Space Shuttle - Development

Postby GinGin » Tue Dec 25, 2018 1:53 pm

Very nice Wayne :)
I alreday have some idea of scenarios

@Legoboyvdlp: As they are at the same speed, they could EVA and will orbit at Mach 28 around the Earth waiting for help :)
But EVA preparation takes time to lower the N2 concentration into the blood ( pure O2 in the EVA suits). So even if they rush the preparation ( risk of N2 bubbles in the blood like for diving), it would be quite long to jump out in case of disaster in the Shuttle I guess.
GinGin
 
Posts: 1580
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 11:41 am
Location: Paris
Callsign: Gingin

Re: Space Shuttle - Development

Postby amalahama » Wed Dec 26, 2018 3:38 pm

Thorsten wrote in Sun Dec 23, 2018 7:46 pm:I was actually wondering whether you might be able to go see it (and take pictures and such...)


Oh yesss!! New hi-res textures will improve hugely the visual appaerance.

@Thorsten, any news regarding the utilization of the 3D external mesh from SSU? I find it extremely good looking, and you might make use of payload's models as well, since they would be compatible.

Best regards, and merry Christmas!
amalahama
 
Posts: 149
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 10:54 am

Re: Space Shuttle - Development

Postby Thorsten » Wed Dec 26, 2018 3:46 pm

@Thorsten, any news regarding the utilization of the 3D external mesh from SSU?


No - from my side this is more an idea than an actual plan - I'm not a 3d modeler myself, so I couldn't do anything with it if I got it in nice form tomorrow.
Thorsten
 
Posts: 12490
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 9:33 am

Re: Space Shuttle - Development

Postby Hooray » Sat Dec 29, 2018 9:03 pm

Referring to (and since this seems to be a recurring question, even among long-term contributors):
https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/ma ... /36504422/
Curt wrote:I've never tried firing up the shuttle even once. [...]
Does the shuttle model have any kind of demo mode or mostly hands off flight mode?


Would it be feasible to discuss if implementing some kind of simple mechanism (UI/CLI) to provide pre-canned flights using any combination of existing features or shuttle infrastructure/code (e.g. instant replay, flight recorder, pre-recorded flights, startup scenarios etc) ?

The point being that this would also help "non-astronauts" to test fgfs-spaceflight without having to spend weeks reading a manual, thinking specifically about troubleshooting, benchmarking/profiling ?

FWIW, for 2 decades now, flying the ufo at high ground speeds has been considered the recommended way to "stress-test" certain FG components like the tile manager (and as many of the contributors know, it's a versatile and handy tool) - and since we keep talking about the shuttle's fgfs performance, it would obviously be interesting for "non-pilots" to still be able to "run" a shuttle "flight" without having to do anything, but still exercise all sorts of code paths that may otherwise not receive much testing at all.

On the other hand, if we can work out a scheme using existing infrastructure, that might also translate into regression testing the shuttle itself (think having different pre-recorded flights and using them to see if the shuttle works properly, e.g. during release preparations).

Again, this is not a feature request, but just to encourage having the discussion whether this is feasible or not (long-term) - since you (Thorsten) mentioned originally that you were not interested in supporting/using the "flight recorder" feature, whereas wlbragg was considering to give it a try IIRC, which ended up overlapping with the development of "startup situations" and "overlay profiles", and you - rightly- pointed out that it would be difficult/impossible for the shuttles state vector to be mapped to the relatively simple "flight recorder" structure.
Please don't send support requests by PM, instead post your questions on the forum so that all users can contribute and benefit
Thanks & all the best,
Hooray
Help write next month's newsletter !
pui2canvas | MapStructure | Canvas Development | Programming resources
Hooray
 
Posts: 12707
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 9:40 am
Pronouns: THOU

Re: Space Shuttle - Development

Postby Thorsten » Sat Dec 29, 2018 9:53 pm

Would it be feasible to discuss if implementing some kind of simple mechanism (UI/CLI) to provide pre-canned flights using any combination of existing features or shuttle infrastructure/code (e.g. instant replay, flight recorder, pre-recorded flights, startup scenarios etc) ?


Would it be asked too much to simply start e.g. --SpaceShuttle-ISS even once and observe what happens before starting to request features?

Spoiler below:


















(It will put you into a stable orbit with all systems configured properly, and you can remain there without any action required probably till the fuel cells need purging - which should give you >48 hours of spaceflight (!) at least).
Thorsten
 
Posts: 12490
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 9:33 am

Re: Space Shuttle - Development

Postby wlbragg » Sat Dec 29, 2018 11:43 pm

I also feel the need to respond and say this is already somewhat accomplished. To launch and achieve orbit you only need to throw approximately a dozen switches which are detailed in the Shuttle help and also the basic Shuttle document. Really any of the startup states (variants) will get you up and running for at least a while without having to do anything. There is even a "Free Flight" which gets you a one way glider (down). The "On Approach" gets you a condition that you can play over and over with the click of a "retry" button. So anyone that uses the excuse they don't have the time to learn how to fly the Shuttle simply isn't paying attention to the features that already exist.
For my part of the development process, I strictly rely on the canned features to load and verify any of my new work, without having to do anything at all.
Kansas and Ohio/Midwest scenery development.
KEQA, 3AU, KRCP Airport Layout
Intel i7/GeForce RTX 2070/Max-Q
User avatar
wlbragg
 
Posts: 7609
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:31 am
Location: Kansas (Tornado Alley), USA
Callsign: WC2020
Version: next
OS: Win10/Linux/RTX 2070

Re: Space Shuttle - Development

Postby eatdirt » Sun Dec 30, 2018 4:37 pm

and I've just been contacted by the company preparing the exhibit about how the FG Shuttle can be rigged to drive the displays and external visuals.


:shock: Ah ah, so nice, congrats, that's so cool!!!

And if they need test pilots to cra..., well stress, the stuff, you know what we do right? ;)
eatdirt
 
Posts: 1012
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 3:06 pm

Re: Space Shuttle - Development

Postby legoboyvdlp » Sun Dec 30, 2018 6:29 pm

It would be relativitely simple to program a sub-autopilot to do everything automatically... relegating the role of the pilot to a mere observer!

Obviously not a realistic feature but it might actually be good to allow the simulator to do e.g. Pilot tasks and leaving the simulator-pilots role to the things done by the commander and so on?
User avatar
legoboyvdlp
 
Posts: 7981
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 2:28 am
Location: Northern Ireland
Callsign: G-LEGO
Version: next
OS: Windows 10 HP

Re: Space Shuttle - Development

Postby Thorsten » Sun Dec 30, 2018 6:51 pm

It would be relativitely simple to program a sub-autopilot to do everything automatically...


Assuming there are no decisions to be made... But since it's trivial to do that if you can do Nasal, I'll leave it to anyone who needs it.
Thorsten
 
Posts: 12490
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 9:33 am

Re: Space Shuttle - Development

Postby Hooray » Mon Dec 31, 2018 3:55 pm

Some people have previously toyed with scripted "copilots", and Stuart's checklist feature makes it possible to "execute" checklists.


PS: as expected, segfault ;-)
Please don't send support requests by PM, instead post your questions on the forum so that all users can contribute and benefit
Thanks & all the best,
Hooray
Help write next month's newsletter !
pui2canvas | MapStructure | Canvas Development | Programming resources
Hooray
 
Posts: 12707
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 9:40 am
Pronouns: THOU

PreviousNext

Return to Spaceflight

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests