- "How the project works" -
Yeah, that's exactly what I've been wondering meanwhile !
Moin!
I may assume that some of the people whose feet people presumably have to kiss in order to be allowed to do something in this forum already understand the greeting. Actually, it is more than far from my intention to introduce myself with my usual pointed pen, but I have never experienced anything like this in decades of membership in a wide variety of forums. I will spare myself details, but not even a paltry signature is possible for me to put; let alone anything else. I don't understand this strange "bug-tracking" either. By some (presumably) coincidence, I was once able to place a message there, which, most interestingly, without any action on my part, was declared to be done by me a few hours later, wao!?...Honestly, I just find it ridiculous now. There may be valid reasons for some
of it. But it would be extremely helpful if these were also communicated somewhere and an explanation given as to how what is to be dealt with in concrete terms?
Since this is obviously too much to ask, briefly just the following bugs: (so that they do not get lost)
1. the airport ENSG, Sogndal, NOR, is ejected in the MP when using the NAV function as Henderson Field, God's praised land, out of service. Navi aids & co for it (ENSG!) are interestingly displayed correctly.
2. At the EDWO, OS-Atterheide, (GER) it is the case that an aircraft is correctly displayed at the start of the active RWY (when looking out of the cockpit window) during sim take-off, whereas on the map Phi, for example, it is displayed considerably offset to the ESE. After a few hundred metres of taxiing towards the tower, in real (simulator) life you are standing on the corresponding apron, but on the map you are still in Wallachia. The same shift applies, of course, to all pre-planned parking positions of the well-developed small airport.
In the MP, the AP and depending RWY is also shifted in the same direction; with the same wrong results.
I had taken the trouble to illustrate and label all this nicely, as I am currently only beginning to understand the "FlightGear system". After the already mentioned (well-intentioned!) first attempt to correct a mistake, I had to realise that I had not kissed any feet or rings and therefore have no right to denounce any malfunctions - although that was far from my mind(!) AND, of course no right to upload any pictures as well!
I actually thought - obviously once again in my "youthful recklessness" - that it would be important here, especially in view of the
enormous scope of the project, that cooperation takes place..... Probably a mistake, since so far I have only been able to detect blocking where possible - with Billy Boy Gate's competing product this would not have surprised me......but here?
Now I'm curious if at least this will pass as a post? But then it will probably turn out that at best I have 400 characters here, like in Bezos Company sites....oddr? Oh ne, lucky!
A lot of lovely greetings!