by alge » Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:52 pm
Hey gooney, if by "the above" you mean my WIP in version, yeah, they're probably not exactly correct (hence the "probably update geometry if we're updating apt.dat" part). I did use GE coordinates for some of the positions as a baseline, but mostly it was based on "take the existing groundnet and tailor it for our current apt.dat and current static objects". Do you think I should drop this effort and we should make a new groundnet from the WED one? Or are you just saying that the positions aren't correct and needs updating? ... If we should generate a new one from the WED data, do you want to contribute that? I'm keen to make sure that the AI code works well with our next default airport, whether it comes from taxidraw or WED doesn't matter too much.