Board index FlightGear The FlightGear project

3.6.0 nightly vs 3.5.0

Questions about the FlightGear organisation, website, wiki etc.

3.6.0 nightly vs 3.5.0

Postby legoboyvdlp » Tue Jul 14, 2015 11:48 pm

Hi I now see 3.5.0... and 3.6.0 nightlies... what is the difference?
User avatar
legoboyvdlp
 
Posts: 7325
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 1:28 am
Callsign: YV-LEGO
Version: next
OS: Windows 10 HP

Re: 3.6.0 nightly vs 3.5.0

Postby clrCoda » Wed Jul 15, 2015 1:57 am

There won't be a tremendous amount of difference early on. This is preparation for 3.6 release candidates, a last attempt to solve as many bugs as possible with out adding any new features until after 3.6 is released, and then the nightly builds become 3.7 so that progressive development can continue, including adding new features that will appear in the 3.8 release. And it goes on like that until everyone quits or everyone is satisfied, or the world ends abruptly :) -- which might never happen in our lifetimes :)

--Ray
Ray St. Marie
clrCoda
 
Posts: 1228
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 11:04 am

Re: 3.6.0 nightly vs 3.5.0

Postby legoboyvdlp » Wed Jul 15, 2015 2:01 am

Oh ok, so 3.5 nightly will dissappear or not bebupdated and 3.6 will be bug-fixes prior to RC?
User avatar
legoboyvdlp
 
Posts: 7325
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 1:28 am
Callsign: YV-LEGO
Version: next
OS: Windows 10 HP

Re: 3.6.0 nightly vs 3.5.0

Postby clrCoda » Wed Jul 15, 2015 2:08 am

You are correct sir! Win a prize! ( it escapes me what old TV game show I heard that phrase before.) :)
--Ray
was it Groucho?
Ray St. Marie
clrCoda
 
Posts: 1228
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 11:04 am

Re: 3.6.0 nightly vs 3.5.0

Postby IAHM-COL » Wed Jul 15, 2015 2:37 am

Well.... also starting now, next time you pull FGDATA next (with or without submodules), you will probably get an error saying minimum FG version required is 3.6. which means time to go 3.6 :P

Every Aircraft (GPL and nonGPL) of FGMEMBERS currently existing, has now been tagged with a FG3.6 status, too
Example, see:

https://github.com/FGMEMBERS/A320neo/releases
https://github.com/FGMEMBERS/TU-95/releases

IH-COL
If we gave everybody in the World free software today, but we failed to teach them about the four freedoms, five years from now, would they still have it? Probably not, because if they don’t recognise their freedoms, they’ll let their freedoms fall
User avatar
IAHM-COL
Retired
 
Posts: 4064
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 5:40 pm
Location: Homey, NV (KXTA) - U.S.A
Callsign: HK-424D or ICAO4243
Version: 3.7-git
OS: Linux

Re: 3.6.0 nightly vs 3.5.0

Postby bugman » Wed Jul 15, 2015 7:19 am

IAHM-COL wrote in Wed Jul 15, 2015 2:37 am:Every Aircraft (GPL and nonGPL) of FGMEMBERS currently existing, has now been tagged with a FG3.6 status, too


Hi Israel,

This tagging might be premature. You'll see that the official FG v3.6 aircraft have not been branched yet (currently only 'release-3.4.0' exists at this link). As for the private hangars, I have not been following them so closely, so I don't know about their v3.6 tagging status. So you will experience a bit of inconsistency if there are any private hangar or official FGAddon aircraft changes before the final branch.

Regards,

Edward


EDIT: If you look at the repositories, you'll see that only the version numbers have changed (e.g. in the FGData 'version' file). There has been no v3.6 tagging as of yet.
bugman
Moderator
 
Posts: 1733
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 9:01 am
Version: next

Re: 3.6.0 nightly vs 3.5.0

Postby IAHM-COL » Wed Jul 15, 2015 4:55 pm

indeed'
I may bump the tags up again when the FGDATA gets a release tag, for consistency purposes.

IH-COL
If we gave everybody in the World free software today, but we failed to teach them about the four freedoms, five years from now, would they still have it? Probably not, because if they don’t recognise their freedoms, they’ll let their freedoms fall
User avatar
IAHM-COL
Retired
 
Posts: 4064
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 5:40 pm
Location: Homey, NV (KXTA) - U.S.A
Callsign: HK-424D or ICAO4243
Version: 3.7-git
OS: Linux

Re: 3.6.0 nightly vs 3.5.0

Postby ThommiTechnik » Sat Jul 25, 2015 5:17 pm

Hoi together,

the last three builds of FlightGear-3.6.0-nightly-full.dmg are not working. The program itself crashes immediately after start-up. Reason:

Process: fgfs [4664]
Path: /Applications/FlightGear.app/Contents/MacOS/fgfs
Identifier: org.flightgear.FlightGear
Version: ???
Code Type: X86-64 (Native)
Parent Process: ??? [1]
Responsible: fgfs [4664]
User ID: 502
Date/Time: 2015-07-23 19:04:20.553 +0200
OS Version: Mac OS X 10.11 (15A225f)
Report Version: 11
Anonymous UUID: B3A21247-A88F-FB78-F94F-CCEB7590B66F
Sleep/Wake UUID: C1C9A257-97D7-4066-A11C-B0CCC0B6C432
Time Awake Since Boot: 21000 seconds
Time Since Wake: 4300 seconds
Crashed Thread: 0
Exception Type: EXC_BREAKPOINT (SIGTRAP)
Exception Codes: 0x0000000000000002, 0x0000000000000000
Exception Note: EXC_CORPSE_NOTIFY
Application Specific Information:
dyld: launch, loading dependent libraries
Dyld Error Message:
Library not loaded: libosgDB.100.dylib
Referenced from: /Applications/FlightGear.app/Contents/Frameworks/libosgText.100.dylib
Reason: image not found



And if you have a look in the last three console-outputs of Jenkins, you'll find this:

~/jenkins-root/workspace/Mac-nightly
Unlocking Hudson keychain for code-signing
Running package script
./hudson_mac_package_release.rb:13: warning: Insecure world writable dir /Users/Shared/Qt in PATH, mode 040777
Code signing identity is Developer ID Application: James Turner
osgVersion=3.2.2, so-number=100
Erasing previous image dir
Running macdeployqt on the bundle to copy Qt libraries
ERROR: no file at "/usr/lib/libosgText.100.dylib"
ERROR: no file at "/usr/lib/libosgSim.100.dylib"
ERROR: no file at "/usr/lib/libosgDB.100.dylib"
ERROR: no file at "/usr/lib/libosgParticle.100.dylib"
ERROR: no file at "/usr/lib/libosgFX.100.dylib"
ERROR: no file at "/usr/lib/libosgUtil.100.dylib"
ERROR: no file at "/usr/lib/libosgViewer.100.dylib"
ERROR: no file at "/usr/lib/libosgGA.100.dylib"
ERROR: no file at "/usr/lib/libosg.100.dylib"
ERROR: no file at "/usr/lib/libOpenThreads.20.dylib"


Maybe someone could have a deeper look whats going on with Jenkins? 3.5 is running good and stable.

Cheers Thomas
ThommiTechnik
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:06 am
Location: Bern, Switzerland
Callsign: HB-IHQ
Version: 3.5
OS: OS X 10.11

Re: 3.6.0 nightly vs 3.5.0

Postby Thorsten » Sun Jul 26, 2015 5:24 am

I've posted a summary of your message to the devel list in case the Mac people aren't reading the forum.
Thorsten
 
Posts: 11374
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:33 am

Re: 3.6.0 nightly vs 3.5.0

Postby ThommiTechnik » Sun Jul 26, 2015 6:36 am

Thanks Thorsten
ThommiTechnik
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:06 am
Location: Bern, Switzerland
Callsign: HB-IHQ
Version: 3.5
OS: OS X 10.11

Re: 3.6.0 nightly vs 3.5.0

Postby ThommiTechnik » Mon Jul 27, 2015 6:49 pm

Still existing, also on last nightly (20150727).

Is it possible, that suddenly the paths could have changed? Shouldn't "/usr/lib" be "/Users/jenkins/jenkins-root/workspace/Mac-nightly/dist/lib"?
ThommiTechnik
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:06 am
Location: Bern, Switzerland
Callsign: HB-IHQ
Version: 3.5
OS: OS X 10.11


Return to The FlightGear project

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest