TheEagle wrote in Wed Mar 09, 2022 7:07 pm:I'm afraid there won't be anyone who's gonna do this, because it is A LOT of work. I'm developing a fairly simple aircraft - the Cessna 210 - sine over half a year now, and it is far from being complete - I'd say I've done a fifth or maybe even just a tenth of the work, even though I'm working on it in all my spare time. Now, the Boeing 727 is not a Cessna - it is FAR more complex, so would require much more work. So, unless you want to take it up yourself, I guess you'll have to put up with the -200 variant (aren't they almost the same ? ).
Raptor wrote in Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:44 pm:Boeing 727-200 is available for FlightGear
https://wiki.flightgear.org/727-200
TheEagle wrote in Thu Mar 10, 2022 3:00 pm:I know, you're talking about helijah, right ? Well, you are right, but for once it's *just* YAsim - and for the other, he doesn't model all the specific pneumatic, hydraulic, fuel systems - just an electrical system that manages to have the lights on at the right times, and a basic 3D model with stock radios and instruments. His goal is quantity rather than detail - nothing wrong with that itself. But, it's these details that make the difference between a 727-100 and a 727-200, and modelling (and researching !) these details takes time. So, unless someone wants to spend 100+ hours on it, one could as well fly the -200 variant instead of the -100, because the difference won't be noticeable anyways.
One problem I found with the Flightgear 727 is that the model mistakes pneumatic brake handle for parking brake.A quite obvious error wish fixed
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests