Board index FlightGear Development Aircraft

777 ALS compared to IDG-A32X lightning

Questions and discussion about creating aircraft. Flight dynamics, 3d models, cockpits, systems, animation, textures.

Re: 777 ALS compared to IDG-A32X lightning

Postby pavlin » Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:50 pm

Wow, that's looks different. Well, I don't know, just was thinking that if the plane is more visible, will be better experience for viewer. Octal, what did you meant by bloom settings?
O, Lego, I think that your's cockpit looks better in night because it is modeled really realistically. With every new fork that your 3D modeler pushes into the plane it gets more and more realistic. Are not that a reason to think it is better?
The light is different. If I land on EDDF with the 777 at the same time it will look more darker on ground, I am sure.
This is only suggestions, I am not trying to pick a fight again.
PavlinS has back.
Complete IDG user of FlightGear. I am making videos!
Checkup my YT channel here:
Follow my videos!
User avatar
Posts: 58
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 3:34 pm
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria [LBSF]
Callsign: PavlinS
Version: 2018 3.1
OS: Windows 10 Pro

Re: 777 ALS compared to IDG-A32X lightning

Postby Lydiot » Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:34 am

it0uchpods wrote in Sun Sep 30, 2018 9:39 pm:@Lydiot.

FGFS 2018.2.1, and IDG-A32X (find in my github in my signature)
Med-High settings and ALS with landmass shaders all the way on.


thx :)
Posts: 929
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 10:50 pm

Re: 777 ALS compared to IDG-A32X lightning

Postby it0uchpods » Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:55 am

No problem

FGFS Aircraft Developer
Lead Programmer at it0uchpods Design Group (Join our Discord!)
Download High Quality Aircraft from it0uchpods Hangar
User avatar
Posts: 3688
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 12:51 pm
Version: 2018.3.1
OS: Windows 10 x64


Return to Aircraft

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 6 guests