Board index FlightGear Development Aircraft

787-9 Project

Questions and discussion about creating aircraft. Flight dynamics, 3d models, cockpits, systems, animation, textures.

Re: 787-9 Project

Postby sp-lcz » Wed Apr 12, 2017 12:24 pm

Hi KIWI34,
maybe could you share with us your 787-9 version? I had problems with 787-8, I found in the internet few versions of this aircraft but with different problems e.g. with A/P. SP-KOK gave me his version and everything is working now.

Lukasz SP-LCZ
User avatar
sp-lcz
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2017 12:42 pm
Location: EPWA
Callsign: SP-LCZ
Version: 17.3.1
OS: Windows 8.1

Re: 787-9 Project

Postby PavlinS » Thu Apr 13, 2017 7:01 pm

I think the problem comes from the OS.
User avatar
PavlinS
Retired
 
Posts: 508
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 8:46 am
Location: Bulgaria, Sofia
Callsign: PavlinS
Version: 2016.4.4
OS: Windows

Re: 787-9 Project

Postby it0uchpods » Thu Apr 13, 2017 8:58 pm

No, it does not, sorry.

No matter what, there are issues with this aircraft sadly.
it0uchpods/WTF411

FGFS Aircraft Developer
Lead Programmer at it0uchpods Design Group
Download High Quality Aircraft from it0uchpods Hangar
User avatar
it0uchpods
 
Posts: 3567
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 12:51 pm
Version: 2018.2.1
OS: Windows 10 x64

Re: 787-9 Project

Postby PavlinS » Wed May 24, 2017 11:26 am

Hey, everyone, eny news about this aircraft????
User avatar
PavlinS
Retired
 
Posts: 508
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 8:46 am
Location: Bulgaria, Sofia
Callsign: PavlinS
Version: 2016.4.4
OS: Windows

Re: 787-9 Project

Postby it0uchpods » Wed May 24, 2017 11:55 am

No.
it0uchpods/WTF411

FGFS Aircraft Developer
Lead Programmer at it0uchpods Design Group
Download High Quality Aircraft from it0uchpods Hangar
User avatar
it0uchpods
 
Posts: 3567
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 12:51 pm
Version: 2018.2.1
OS: Windows 10 x64

Re: 787-9 Project

Postby PavlinS » Wed May 24, 2017 8:19 pm

So sad,
I hope soon to has some good news. I am sick to fly 777......... LOL
User avatar
PavlinS
Retired
 
Posts: 508
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 8:46 am
Location: Bulgaria, Sofia
Callsign: PavlinS
Version: 2016.4.4
OS: Windows

Re: 787-9 Project

Postby it0uchpods » Wed May 24, 2017 10:29 pm

Well, there will be a really advanced A330-300 in a 1, 2 or maybe more years.... hint hint.

There is also some other planes that are good.

Kind Regards,
Josh
it0uchpods/WTF411

FGFS Aircraft Developer
Lead Programmer at it0uchpods Design Group
Download High Quality Aircraft from it0uchpods Hangar
User avatar
it0uchpods
 
Posts: 3567
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 12:51 pm
Version: 2018.2.1
OS: Windows 10 x64

Re: 787-9 Project

Postby zacarias » Thu May 25, 2017 11:12 pm

Well, I downloaded a 787-9 from Gthub which flies quite well. But I don't remember from where exactly I downloaded it...
FG 2017.3.1
LinuxMint 18 Cinnamon 64-bit
Processor AMD A8-6600K
Graphics Nvidia GTX 1050 Ti
zacarias
 
Posts: 179
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2016 1:06 am

Re: 787-9 Project

Postby PavlinS » Fri May 26, 2017 10:30 am

Me too. Gaves un erorrs.
User avatar
PavlinS
Retired
 
Posts: 508
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 8:46 am
Location: Bulgaria, Sofia
Callsign: PavlinS
Version: 2016.4.4
OS: Windows

Re: 787-9 Project

Postby japanair772 » Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:26 am

Could someone please do the new Qantas livery?
FlightGear Pilot
Callsign: Airbus, Boeing
Love Airbus Boeing, Embraer, Bombardier, Mitsubishi, ATR
Have a nice day Good day!
japanair772
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2017 6:43 am
Location: Earth, Universe
OS: Mac OS X

Re: 787-9 Project

Postby evaair714 » Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:02 pm

japanair772 wrote in Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:26 am:Could someone please do the new Qantas livery?

Is this one which you want??
Image
evaair714
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 9:21 am

Re: 787-9 Project

Postby PavlinS » Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:05 pm

People, how you are using this thing?
User avatar
PavlinS
Retired
 
Posts: 508
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 8:46 am
Location: Bulgaria, Sofia
Callsign: PavlinS
Version: 2016.4.4
OS: Windows

Re: 787-9 Project

Postby sp-lcz » Tue Jun 06, 2017 9:33 pm

PavlinS,
I always use checklists for the aircraft and manual startup. In 787-9 A/P didn’t work for me definitely until this week. Few days ago I have noticed that when I use autostart, A/P works almost correctly (problem with changing Mach / Knots – I had to use only knots, but let say it is acceptable). I did all flight from LEMD to EDDK:
https://fgtracker.ml/modules/fgtracker/ ... ID=6907540
On Nasal console was a lot of errors but flight was ended with succes.
Try to use autostart, maybe A/P will work for you too.

Regards,
Lukasz
User avatar
sp-lcz
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2017 12:42 pm
Location: EPWA
Callsign: SP-LCZ
Version: 17.3.1
OS: Windows 8.1

Re: 787-9 Project

Postby PavlinS » Tue Jun 06, 2017 11:15 pm

can you post a link?
I always use the Autostart. I know only 777 for manual and space shuttleonly.
User avatar
PavlinS
Retired
 
Posts: 508
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 8:46 am
Location: Bulgaria, Sofia
Callsign: PavlinS
Version: 2016.4.4
OS: Windows

Re: 787-9 Project

Postby zacarias » Tue Jun 06, 2017 11:51 pm

I always use autostart, at least with this aircraft. The autopilot seems to bee working very well (unlike the 787-8).
The only thing worth to mention is an error while loading the plane. It states: "Error reading panel Failed to open file (reported by SimGear XML parser)".
But afterwards it works quite well. If the 787-8 worked so good it would be great.
FG 2017.3.1
LinuxMint 18 Cinnamon 64-bit
Processor AMD A8-6600K
Graphics Nvidia GTX 1050 Ti
zacarias
 
Posts: 179
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2016 1:06 am

PreviousNext

Return to Aircraft

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 12 guests