Right. It makes things faster and easier. Right? Exactly the same goal as I was talking about.
V12 wrote in Sat Jul 31, 2021 4:00 pm:I'm happy to use MCDU for flight planning (and other things).
It is much more realistic than route manager.
But "ready to taxi" and "ready to start engines" is NOT more realistic. Still, they're there, right? So the argument that it needs to be realistic can be used against that too. But it isn't.
Octal450 wrote in Sat Jul 31, 2021 3:17 pm:It's not any harder to use the MCDU vs Route Manager. You still type what you want and insert... I fail to see how it's harder to get up in a air?
I didn't say it was harder to get up in the air, I meant it was easier for someone who already knows Route Manager to just keep using it instead of having to learn how to do something else.
V12 wrote in Fri Jul 30, 2021 9:07 pm:and SimBrief integration. Because as in the reality, You can download flightplan only with not running engines. For flight planning, check SimBrief, create an account - it is free. Make flightplan and You can download this flightplan and other OFP data into FMGC. Check this video for more details :
See the Route Manager in FlightGear is common to all aircraft that allow it. So I had to learn that only once. Now I have had to learn that and add "SimBrief" (I have no idea what that is) and create an account apparently. And watch another video to learn how to do it.
From the perspective of someone who already knows Route Manager and doesn't want to spend more time learning more ways of getting the same thing done this isn't really an improvement.
But since people are saying it's impossible to have Route Manager and this work at the same time it's really not worth talking about.