by vitos » Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:07 pm
I am psychologist, so do know who is who, can differ it from who that one trying to seem to others. Moreover, I am social psychologist, so can differ free society from society trying to look free. With proofs solid for anyone thinkable - triple reliability. Maybe I pressed You to wrong solutions a bit myself, but don't think so. Choice was Yours, and at real relations You can fail deeply only once. As with real plane or spacecraft You are crashing once only.
You know, at times of Soyuz-Apollo, or Apollo-Soyuz, as at two countries sequence of names was different, project, even new type of docking device was invented, so called androgynous docking system, to make docking equal, looking as handshake instead of, You know. But since here is not possibility of mp docking at FG existed, and even Gemini 7-6A flight was not modelled at proper time, it looks as here will not be an "Apollo".
You chose to make model of hugy flying iron instead, to show everyone that Yours is bigger cheaper way and without any possibility of equality - what would await "Buran" here I do know by attitude to "Su-15", "MiG-15", and "Vostok-1", which I can see clearly by comparison of number of messages at forum and tone of these, number of mp users, etc, with models of similar type and quality. So to fit something and someone here is not my problem, I am not from those rainbow guys who are so selfish that gets to direct, You know, comparison.
Also, I will not make "Soyuz", as here is not possible to dock someone else really at FG. I could make core things for realistic mp docking alone, but someone who meant to make whole space OS simulator alone would went here never at all; and experience with "Vostok" says what such additions would not be used as way to equality and community, but would be used literally instead. "Vostok" wasn't led to common work, both at Russian FG group and here, so I do know for sure what "Soyuz" couldn't.
Plus, even much easier "Su-15" is not flown by others mostly. In fact, not one of you could led realistic Soviet spacecraft model to point real spacecraft crashed finally, so it's useless in means of population increasing. While to me myself it's not interesting, as I am interested not in crash, but ways to avoid it. These was and is not presented here and there. With Soyuz-1 flight all is known. There was no chance really, so it's no use to reproduce that in means of investigation too.
After all, I will not do anything more than what was done already with you. I got my first point to feel what something is wrong, second one to see where line goes instead of it should, and third to be sure that it going that way. I do not need more and do not care of ones who needs or saying so, as they are needing not my care and treatment, but special one.
If I was something as You/you, then I would praise Your nasal fake Earth thing or Shuttle model with fake nasal ISS to moment someone else made really complex things as new Earth engine or Moon with Apollo for mp crew, and then You could say that I betrayed You and Your plans. I suppose You will say it anyway, but not about me. As I cant do something as that - I do have clear view of how things are going to be. It's easy, since I am living at reality where these was made many times before. And using others as rocket stages or engine fuel is not included, since I do know, not theoretically only, but by historical facts, that You can't go way far that way.
It's you who rejected to shake my hand and proposed Your pingas instead. More than once. If that project not goes direction I meant, to really international community somehow profitable to participators, so they can work not worrying about their future everywhere - not one valuable to me is interested in that, me too, as it is not part of future, and will get away when current will become past.
It takes some humanity to believe that alien can be friend. You did't had it - pity, but nothing special. Also, to invest in someone planning to make drugs and sell these is a mean business, but in some situations could worth it, while investment in some addict is complete junk, and I can't see way by which simulation here could become reality for most of participants. More important, they don't look as they want it to become reality, as more realistic models attracts them less than simplified ones. Go . . .
Waste of time: too unprofitable for work, too exhausting for hobby.